- software engineers are spoiled. I can say it, I'm one of you! We get all the perks - nice offices, high salaries, flexible hours, all sorts of benefits. In the end we are lazy - why move somewhere else if you like where you work. Most IT people like their jobs, their colleagues and have no incentive to move
- IT salaries are on the rise. You usually don't think about moving if your salary increases anyway where you work
- GOOD software engineers are rare. By GOOD I mean those that can work in various projects, can adapt to multiple clients, can focus on a job today and on another tomorrow just to balance clients. Most IT people get comfortable doing a particular job and are afraid to move on when new opportunities arise because they are afraid of change (most people are!)
- for a software engineer, there is no pressure to find another job now. There are always so many offers that there is hardly any incentive to get up and start searching.
21 July 2015
Why finding a good software engineer has become a nightmare in the last five years
16 May 2010
Are touch screen tablets the computers of the future?
1 May 2010
Courier, Slate cancelled! Not so many tablets after all...
29 April 2010
Google's Android - how come it's being adopted so easily?
28 April 2010
Gizmodo's battle over the lost phone
As we've already written here, there is an opinion that Apple's struggle with the lost and found phone has the potential of being just a very new way of advertising the new 4G phone. However, over the last few days, the plot thickened for Gizmodo's editor, Jason Chen. Apple filed a complaint with the local California police and because of this his home has been searched and equipment has been seized by the police in the attempt to find out whether he committed a crime because he purchased the phone for $5000 as Gizmodo admitted they did upfront.
While there is a whole discussion about journalistic ethic, of whether it was nice or not that money was payed for the phone, the question of criminal allegations seems ridiculous at least as seen from Europe. In the end if you look at the issue, all the guy did was find some material to write about. Was it OK to spend $5000 for it? Why not? It was a hot product and he needed it! He didn't buy THE STORY, he acquired the material on which the story is based, so I don't even see an ethical problem here.
I think it is obvious for everybody that Chen won't be prosecuted and this is just a little harassment tactic, but I can't help notice that this story keeps generating headlines which are indeed very good if Apple is preparing a iPhone 2 or iPhone 4G launch. Apple has every interest to make this story bigger so I think they will go as far as they can with the legal fiasco. Of course, Chen could be in on the plot, in which case ethics would be a big issue, but personally I think he's just being used. Time will tell.
27 April 2010
Not enough IPads available? Apple's got help! :)
However, the sellers of these weird Apple/MS contraptions are sure they would improve on the hastily assembled device and will copy it better in the coming weeks. For the moment sales seem to be going very well, especially since it seems this device has three USB ports and is cheaper than the original! At least for a very small window of opportunity (until Apple manages to catch up and supply the demand worldwide) a prospective buyer of Apple's IPad should take care of any bargains being offered :)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/26/AR2010042602980.html
25 April 2010
How oversharing things can ruin your life
Or maybe it's not a best idea to tell the world everything you do every minute!
Let's face it if you spend your day twitting and facebooking and have hundreds of followers and friends (wow - you're popular) chances are some of those might not be so well intentioned. I know of a recent case in which a someone posted on facebook a message venting about a fight they had with their boss. While this might seem a legitimate way of venting, perhaps it would be wise do it the old fashioned way - in front of a mug of beer and some live friends. I don't have to add the obvious: the boss saw the post (it was public!) and the situation was at least embarrasing. It could've been worse.
Recently I saw a piece of news about a new startup service called blippy. The idea behind it is that you register your credit cards with it and every time you make a payment they share it with your friends. While technically sound, I don't know for the life of me why on earth you would use such a service. Of course, some retailers decided to include credit-card numbers in their statements and voila - these got leaked into the internet via Google's cache (read the article above to know more on how this happened). Ok - it might have been an accident, but the question remains - why would you want to share so much?
Is it absolutely necessary to tell everyone that is out there that you are going to the bathroom? Is it absolutely required that someone named terribleivan82777 knows you just purchased a new phone? (and find out your credit card details in the process?). Do you have to tweet EVERYTHING?
24 April 2010
Hubble Telescope at 20: NASA Astronomers' Top Photos
23 April 2010
Apple's lost phone
Presumably some two weeks ago a careless Apple engineer went to a bar wearing a top-secret Apple gadget (the next generation iPhone). He got drunk (or just dizzy) and left the bar without the aforementioned gadget. Some other patron found it and handed it back to the wrong person. Then someone in the crowd realized there was something amiss with this phone.
Long story short, the phone made its way to the Gizmodo headquarters (in exchange for 5000$ as they claim) where it was properly disected and inverstigated (here). Apple's official response was to write an official letter to Gizmodo asking for the phone back.
This episode has been widely related and most commentators are just astonished at this terrible Apple mistake. However, one (or at least I) cannot but think wether the whole thing wasn't just Steve Job's latest marketing stunt. Ever since he showed off the first iPod some years ago, the man demonstrated a keen sense of showmanship. But iPhone is a product that has been around for some time and generating the hype for a second version is not as easy as the first time around. Nothing better that a stunt like this to get the buzz going, isn't it? And the luck to find someone to spot a different iPhone which looks almost identical to the old one is at least suspicious! Not to mention it getting to Gizmodo and the apparent convenient imposibility for Apple to track it down before it being disected by the guys there (for those who don't know iPhone has an application capable of traking phones and even shutting them down remotely).
22 April 2010
Adobe and Apple in fight over flash
That the giant Apple's newest gadget - the IPAD - has a few notable high profile missing things we've talked about before. However, it transpires that at least one of these features - that is Flash integration is missing intentionally. Allegedly, Adobe demonstrated that it is possible to run Flash on an IPAD, but this functionality has been disabled "by design".
Recently Adobe announced publicly it abandoned the plans to make Flash work on the Apple IPAD. Mike Chambers, wrote that because of the obvious attempt made by Apple to ban the use of Flash on their device, the Flash team will concentrate on making Flash available to all Apple's competitors, citing the Android operating system.
Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/194764/why_adobe_abandoned_iphone_flash_app_plans.html
My oppinion is that Apple is making a huge mistake here. It is allowing it's competitors an advantage in the long run, because let's face it: Flash is present to some degree on around 50% of important websites. If Apple thinks these websites will change their look for IPAD's sake it's probably a bad case of too much self-confidence! Two options here. Either Apple will reconsider in a future software update or will lose market share to less polished but more permissive competitors.




